(Belgrade, Novi Sad, Vukovar, Zagreb)
We entered Serbia on the border near to Szeged, a little town in Hungary that is home to the famous Pick salami (in which I am one of the share holders for some ten years now). Pick salami has bought the other famous brand in Hungary ' Hertz Salami' and is now a virtual private monopolist on the Hungarian market for meat products. Of course we visited the factory to obtain a yearly report and were happy to find out that its financial status is still healthy. The salami slicing behaviour of the share price must have been due to other reasons and I am convinced that the fact that the Pick Szeged share will one day turn out to be a right investment tip (nb that never happened and it was taken away from the Budapest Stock exchange in 2004 or so).
Another good investment tip are insurance companies in Serbia. That Yugoslavia still
exists despite the crossing on the green card of Yu (international car insurance)
we found out when we had to buy an additional insurance for 80 euro. The argument
that our insurance company had assured us that Yugoslavia does no longer exist and
that insurance for Serbia is guaranteed by them was waived away. In fact it was the
most stupid thing I could have said when entering proud Yugoslavia, consisting of
Serbia, Montenegro and Voivodina -
The roads in Serbia are rather empty, perhaps because of the toll, but that does
not prevent them of being dangerous too. There are two lanes for driving and a lane
of refuge. The latter was used however as the main carriage-
From the border, it was a mere hour to Novi Sad, the city the Nato had bombed heavily during the Kosovo war in May 1999. We were in a hurry and also a bit afraid of driving in this city with a Dutch registration plate. The atmosphere was a bit grim although the old lady in a shop was very happy to see 'guests from Holland'. So we drove on and missed the bombed bridges.
Two days later, however we had the opportunity to return and to make the pictures
of one of the bridges that was still broken down, and partly collapsed in the river.
An impressive sight on a sunny Sunday when looking down from the nice citadel of
Novi Sad. The Serbs did not yet repair all bridges due to financial reasons and perhaps
because they hope that the other Danube countries that want undisturbed shipping
will push the West to rebuild them. One new ponton bridge that is being opened for
ships only every few days should underline the need. And indeed, probably some assistance
will be given, at least to remove the old bridge.
But for the time being, we did noy yet arrive in Beograd 'the white city' and we wanted to reach the house of our 'guesthouse' before it would get dark, so we continued on this three lane ' highway'. The suburbs of Belgrade started promising with some new modern appartment blocks, but soon the same grey flats emerged which we already saw in Chemnitz, Brno, Bratislava, Prague and Budapest and that still reminds you of communist eastern europe. Turning to Sawa Centre from the highway, we had our first encounter with the the Kosovo damage when we saw the bombed tower of the socialist party. All windows were blown away, but unlike the World Trade Centre in New York it managed somehow to remain on its feet. We drove on to the city centre where we found the right street after some searching (all street names are in cyrillic).
Next day visiting Belgrade we started with the old Kalamegdan citadel, situated at the point where the Danube and the Sawa river meet (later we saw in the mountains of Slovenia in Bohinj the source of the Sawa river). Most of the citadel originates from the 17th century, but the area has been fortified since Celtic times already, as Beograd is an old city. The Celtic settlement of Singidunum was founded in the 3rd century BC. The Romans arrived in the first century AD and stayed till the 5th century. The present Slavonic name Beograd first appeared in a Papal letter in 878 and the city became the capital of Serbia in 1403, when the Serbs were pushed north by the Turks (taking Belgrade in 1521). In 1842 the city became the capital of Serbia again and in 1918 of the whole of Yugoslavia.
Nowadays the city has more than one side, as if it did not yet decide which direction to go. There are some new and modern streets with shops well stocked and there is an old area with flee markets and with shops selling everything to make a living. Where the centres of Prague, Budapest and Bratislava flourish, Beograd still shows the signs of over ten year of war economy and economic sanctions.
Most impressive in the city are not the touristic monuments, there aren't many, but the bombed remainings of the Ministries of Defence and of Interior Affairs. You can clearly see where these rockets hit the building. A gaping hole and collapsed concrete floors show the impact of precision bombs. The damage to these buildings is significant and it is almost a miracle that the buildings and resident blocks nearby show so little damage. Odd is also the billboard of MacDonalds right in front of the ruins of Serb intelligence forces (see also the box at the bottom of this page for news flashes from this period).
After seeing so much misery, it is good to relax in the evening. That can be done very well in Belgrade. Night Life is vibrant with many good bars and lots of young people are outside on Saturday, but also during the week. In summer the terraces are full and disco boats float over the river till deep in the morning. It is as if the youngsters of Yugoslavia want to get rid of the past by creating an optimistic mood, like Europe in the 1920s after WW1. On the other hand there are a lot of so called skin heads with leather jackets that make the mood often more grim. Perhaps they are the same people who had to fight in those terrible wars and who are now in their 20s and 30s?
Leaving Belgrade with many unsolved questions we drove along the new highway and then left the highway to go via secondary roads to the border between Croatia and Serbia to have a look at the war damage in Vukovar. The border crossing was small and the difference between the Croat and Serb sides was striking. On the Serb side an old small concrete building with an old fashioned stove inside was the only facility for the frontier guards. There was an old rusty barrier that had to be opened by hand and there was no cover against the rain. 100 meter further there was a brand new Croat border post. With such a large difference, it almost looked a deliberate choice of the Serbs not upgrading the border crossing, like with the ruined ministries in Belgrade and destroyed bridges in Novi Sad.
When in Croatia and approaching Vukovar, it soon became clear that also the Croats did not yet repair all the damage. We were driving through an area that in 1991 and 1992 was a battle field. Heavy fights took place between the Serbs and the Croats when the Croats declared indepence. At first the Serbs managed to conquer one third of Croat territory, but after a cease fire initiated by the UN they withdraw. Only the significant Serb minority in the Krajina declared their independence, but that area was later regained by the Croats. We saw road signs riddled with bullets, bullet holes in almost every house, mine fields and collapsed electricity pylons (masts). On the outskirts of Vukovar many private houses were rebuilt, but in the centre it seemed as if the war had just ended yesterday. Words cannot describe what we saw, but the following pictures speak for themselves.
We left Vukovar with a new conscience of what had really happened in Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Mr. Milosevic should not only be sentenced for what he has done in Kosovo and Bosnia, places we did not yet dare to visit, but also for the terrible atrocities in Croatia and even to his own people, the innocent citizens living in the resident blocks near the bombed ministries who must have been terribly frightened during the attacks and whose income for ten years has shown the same pattern as my salami shares. Let's not play the Balkan blues again!
Box: news flashes from May, 1999
Allied Air Chief Stresses Hitting Belgrade Sites
BRUSSELS, Belgium -
In his first interview since the conflict began, Lt. Gen. Michael Short said that
the alliance has expanded its attacks in Kosovo, including a dramatic day-
But he also stressed that NATO needs to press its attacks in Belgrade, brushing aside critics who say the allies should show restraint following the mistaken strike against the Chinese embassy.
"At the same time that I am executing SACEUR's number one priority -
SACEUR is the NATO acronym for the alliance's surpreme commander, Gen. Wesley Clark,
Short offered his blunt assessment of the planning and conduct of the war in an hour-
While he was careful not to criticize NATO diplomats, Short signaled that he feels constrained by the political limits on the bombing of Belgrade in recent days and that the graduated air campaign approved by NATO's diplomats runs counter to his instincts as an airman.
Air Force doctrine calls for striking government ministries, television stations, electrical plants and command centers from the outset. But it took weeks for the military to win approval to bomb "leadership targets," institutions that the Milosevic regime uses to run the country and which are important to maintain his hold on power.
"Airmen would have liked to have gone after that target set on the first night and sent a clear signal that we were taking the gloves off from the very beginning, that we were not going to incrementalize, that we're not going to try to a little bit of this and see how you like it and try a little bit of that and see how you like it," Short said.
"The way we did business during the first couple of nights in Baghdad went to the heart of the problem," the general added, referring to the strikes at the outset of the 1991 Persian Gulf war. "We sent a clear signal to Saddam that we were after the very heart of his operation. Nineteen nations voting, competing pressures, that makes it very, very difficult to do that."
The base in Vicenza is located at the end of a two-
Large screens in the darkened battle center shows NATO's air armada in and around Yugoslavia. More than 400 NATO officers, including war planners, air traffic controllers and intelligence specialists work at the center during each shift. Short runs the war from the battle center, dressed in his green flight suit and wearing an aviator's scarf.
The son of an army officer, the 55-
Short has been involved with the former Yugoslavia since 1995 when as chief of staff for the NATO air forces in southern Europe he planned air strikes against Serbian forces in Bosnia.
Last year, the Balkan conflict thrust him in a diplomatic role. He accompanied Richard
Holbrooke, the U.S. envoy, to Belgrade. The general's task was to negotiate monitoring
arrangements for an accord limiting Serb forces in Kosovo, drawing on U-
During one of the Belgrade meetings, Milosevic asked him jokingly if he would be the man to bomb Yugoslavia if Holbrooke's talks failed.
The commander of Yugoslavia's Air Force, however, was not in a joking mood. He stressed his units were not responsible for the assaults against ethnic Albanians in Kosovo and were not looking for a fight with NATO. But Short left the Serbian Air Force under no illusion that it would escape attack if NATO decided it needed to resort to force.
"I said, 'Hey, I understand that, but you are part of your national defense establishment," he recalled. "You are part of Milosevic's regime."
After Yugoslavia violated the accord and NATO launched air strikes, however, Short found himself under many constraints.
The U.S. Air Force generals involved in the air campaign during the Gulf War had far more authority to plan and carry out the bombing strikes. They also had a direct relationship to Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf, the allied commander.
But Short, the top airman in an airwar, admits he is more of an implementor of a
"I am an executor more than I am an air campaign planner," he said.
Under NATO's complex command structure, Short does not report directly to Clark,
but to a U.S. Navy admiral in Naples -
"I think that colors the equation a bit in terms of my latitude, if you will, in this air campaign, Short said.
There are plenty of other difficulties, which have turned what was intended to be a brief demonstration of force into a grinding battle of attrition. Without troops on the ground, for example, it is hard for NATO pilots to identify their targets.
"I don't think there's any question it affects me," Short said. "I'd like to have
that company commander down there on the ground saying to my son, the A-
Fleeing refugees and the alliance's concern with limiting civilian casualties have
added to his burden. After U.S. F-
"I put out guidance saying that if you are working a target area and you're not sure call me and I'll tell you whether to drop or not," he said. "Call me and describe the village and say, 'Boss, I see a village and I see tanks parked next to the houses in the village. What do you want me do do?' And I'll say 'Tell them to hit the tanks.' And if he hits a house by mistake, that's my responsibility.
"I need to take the monkey off the young captain's back," he added. "They're up there at 400 to 500 miles an hour, people shooting at them, dodging in and our of the weather. They don't need the additional responsibility of, 'What'll happen if I miss that tank? Will I be in trouble?"
As more planes have been sent to bases in Europe and as the weather has improved, NATO has escalated its air strikes. Wednesday, officials said the alliance launched eight waves of attack, including a record 327 bombing missions.
Military experts, however, still differ about the utility of airpower and how it should be used. While Air Force officers generally believe the best way to score a decisive victory is to take the war to the enemy leadership from the start, Army and Marine Corps have traditionally been skeptical of Air Force strategy, stressing the need to attack enemy ground troops and cut off their supplies and communications.
Diplomats, for their part, have been anxious to see the war brought to a close, but have been worried about civilian casualties. Given the political constraints, many Air Force officers insist the bombing campaign against Kosovo is not a true test of what air power can accomplish.
Certainly, many of the bombing decisions are not up to Short. Some political targets are still off limits. Concern over civilian casualties had prevented the alliance from attacking some communications centers. Military targets in Montenegro cannot be struck without elaborate political consultations.
As NATO escalates its strikes, Clark noted he is stepping up his attacks on Serb troops in Kosovo.
"General Clark has set for me as my number one priority, the killing of that Army
in Kosovo," Short said. "And I think I am going to be able to do that. Not tomorrow
or the next day, but we have flown our first daytime B-
But the Serb troops in Kosovo are just one class of targets he is interested in. The other include Belgrade, where the Yugoslav leadership lives, and the rest of Serbia.
And these days striking directly at the Milosevic regime is very much on his mind. While NATO says it is not fighting against the Serbian people, Short also hopes the distress of the Yugoslav public will undermine support for the authorities in Belgrade.
"I think no power to your refrigerator, no gas to your stove, you can't get to work
because the bridge is down -
Yugoslavia's capital braced for a fourth day of NATO air strikes, announced to the sound of air raid sirens and a large explosion outside the Belgrade on Saturday afternoon.
Air raid sirens also went off in Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, the smaller of the two republics that make up the Yugoslav federation.
The leaders of democratic, pro-
The new strikes come a day after Belgrade residents watched fireballs shooting into the night sky and shattering windows around the city. Friday's raids were the heaviest and closest to the city's center since airstrikes began Wednesday.
In three days of attacks, Belgrade has become a shadow of its former self. Main streets are largely deserted.
Many in Belgrade took cover Friday in underground shelters. Their fears were compounded by reports that a factory had been hit and was spewing toxic fumes into the air.
Yugoslav authorities said that was the result of a strike on a civilian pharmaceutical plant: NATO said the escaping fumes may have come from a factory that produced missile and rocket fuel. Another NATO strike set fire to a forest close to a popular Belgrade suburb.
NATO resolve 'absolute'
NATO hopes the raids will force Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic to sign a peace agreement that will end a year of ethnic strife in the Serb province of .
NATO officials say the Yugoslav offensive in Kosovo must stop before the bombing ends.
"NATO's resolve to continue this operation until our objectives are met remains absolute," NATO spokesman said in Brussels on Saturday.
Yugoslavian media claim the bomb and missile attacks have inflicted numerous -
Music: War in Yugoslavia (1992,
composed during the Balkan war) ©
|Finance / Euro|
|Camping with lions|
|Barcelona - Villareal|
|Bedelen om rust|